Muse Ember (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis | Artificial Analysis
Paper

Muse Ember (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis | Artificial Analysis

Artificial Analysis
2026.11.10
·Service·by 성산
#AI#DL#LLM#ML#RAG

Key Points

  • 1Meta’s Muse Ember (Max), released in November 2026, is a proprietary reasoning model that achieves an Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 36, significantly outperforming the median score of 24.
  • 2The model offers highly competitive pricing at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, while maintaining a 1-million-token context window.
  • 3Demonstrating strong operational efficiency, Muse Ember (Max) processes tasks in 3.2 minutes with a 4.37-second time to first answer token, positioning it as both faster and more cost-effective than typical models in its class.

Muse Ember (Max) is a proprietary reasoning model developed by Meta, released in November 2026. According to the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it achieves a score of 36, significantly outperforming the median score of 24 for comparable models.

Core Methodology and Evaluation

The model’s intelligence is quantified via the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (v5.0.1), a composite benchmark that aggregates performance across nine distinct domains: AA-Briefcase v1.1 (agentic knowledge work), AutomationBench-AA (SaaS workflows), Terminal-Bench 4.0 (coding/terminal use), FrontierCode 2.0 (repository-level software engineering), AA-Omniscience v1.1 (knowledge reliability/hallucination rates), GDP.pdf (document reasoning), HLE-Diamond (reasoning and knowledge), CritPt v2 (physics reasoning), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (scientific research workflows).

The methodology utilizes a weighted average cost and performance framework. The total weighted cost per task (CtaskC_{task}) is derived from the costs associated with input, cache hits, cache writes, reasoning, and output tokens (Ti,Tc,Tw,Tr,ToT_i, T_c, T_w, T_r, T_o):

Ctask=∑j=19wj(Inputj⋅Pi+Cachej⋅Pc+Outputj⋅PoNtasks)C_{task} = \sum_{j=1}^{9} w_j \left( \frac{Input_j \cdot P_i + Cache_j \cdot P_c + Output_j \cdot P_o}{N_{tasks}} \right)

where wjw_j represents the weight of evaluation jj. The performance is measured via "Time per Intelligence Index Task," calculated as the ratio of output tokens produced per task to the model's end-to-end output speed.

Performance and Technical Specifications

Muse Ember (Max) is categorized as a "reasoning" model, meaning it employs extended chain-of-thought processing before yielding an output. Key technical benchmarks include:
  • Latency: A time-to-first-answer-token of 4.37s and an output speed of 446 tok/s.
  • Efficiency: It completes tasks in 3.2 minutes, which is faster than the median of 7.5 minutes for its peer group.
  • Verbosity: The model generates 115M output tokens across the index, indicating a higher-than-average verbosity (median: 90M).
  • Context: It supports a 1M token context window, equivalent to approximately 1,573 pages of 12-point Arial font.
  • Modality: The model is multimodal, accepting both text and image inputs while providing text outputs.

Economic Positioning

Muse Ember (Max) is positioned as a competitively priced, high-intelligence model. Its pricing structure is 0.10per1Minputtokensand0.10 per 1M input tokens and0.50 per 1M output tokens, with a 96% cache discount. Compared to market medians of 0.24and0.24 and0.80 respectively, it serves as a high-performance option for enterprise-grade reasoning and agentic workflows.